Legal Opinion

State v. Rose

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 13, 1975No. I CA-CR 854PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Chief Judge,

Division 1.

Appellant-defendant, David Robert Rose, was charged with attempted rape, and was found guilty by the trial judge sitting without a jury of the charge of aggravated assault. Imposition of sentence was suspended for a period of five years and defendant was placed on probation.

On appeal he raises two contentions: (1) that he was denied a speedy trial, and (2) that the court never determined that he was competent to stand trial, nor was there ever a written stipulation of submission of this question to the court based upon certain medical reports.

The facts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. ShawArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State v. BlazakArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. BallingerArizona Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State Ex Rel. Berger v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN AND FOR COUNTY OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LandrumArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. ValenzuelaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. State v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. State v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  5. State v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API