Legal Opinion

People v. Boback

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 21, 1968PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeating, J.

Is the use of the Simplified Traffic Information (Code Crim. Pro., § 147-a et seq.) authorized where the information is based solely upon information and belief, and, if so, is its employment constitutional 1 These are the questions raised by two cases from the Herkimer County Court.

Boback was convicted of the offense of ‘ ‘ Following Too Closely ” (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 1129, subd. [a]) and was fined $20. On February 21, 1967, about 3:15 p'.m., defendant was driving on Route 5 in the Town of Schuyler and became involved in an accident. Thereafter, he was presented with a Uniform Traffic…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Livingston v. WyattNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Weeks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
  3. People v. BarattaNassau County District Court · 1968
  4. People v. GroosSuffolk County District Court · 1967
  5. People v. RadakNew York Court of Special Session · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. NuccioNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. People v. BrabhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Farkas v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1978
  4. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. People v. FattizziAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API