Radford v. Johnson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Cass County; Pollock, J. Action by James B. Badford against Abraham B. Johnson. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
The parties to this action own adjoining farms, both situate in the same section, plaintiff’s being the southwest quarter and defendant’s the southeast quarter. The real, dispute is as to the proper location of the boundary line dividing their farms. The tract in controversy consists of a narrow strip about 19 feet wide, and in quantity about one-half acre. Both parties agree upon the *183location of the original government corners marking the four corners of the section in which their land is located. ■ Plaintiff fixes the beginning of the dividing line between them at a point on the south…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Gregory v. KnightMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Arneson v. SpawnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
- Cronin v. GoreMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Clark v. Henry's Adm'rSupreme Court of Missouri · 1845
- Case v. TrappMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Seabrook v. Coos Bay Ice Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Benson v. Feland Brothers PropertiesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
- Emmil v. SmithNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Nystrom v. LeeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Propper v. WohlwendNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.