Legal Opinion
Milano v. Apfel
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 7, 2000No. 3:98CV95 AWTPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ENDORSEMENT ORDER
THOMPSON, District Judge.
Upon review and pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 2 of the Local Rules for United States Magistrate Judges (D.Conn.), Magistrate Judge Martinez’s Recommended Ruling granting the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and denying defendant’s motion for order affirming the decision of the Commissioner is hereby ACCEPTED.
SO ORDERED.
RECOMMENDED RULING
MARTINEZ, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before this court are the plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. # 7) and the Defendant’s Motion for Order Affirming the Decision of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Ramona PEREZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Patrick Balsamo v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shrack v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
- McIntire v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
- Bellamy v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2000
- Garcia v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Staib v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.