Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Zeagler Auto Service, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 28, 1983No. 0028PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

The issue in this action for conversion of personal property is whether the lower court erred in permitting the respondent Zeagler Auto Service, Inc. (Zeagler), to file a late answer to the appellant Phillip Nelson’s complaint. We find no abuse of discretion and affirm.

Zeagler, a wrecker service, áud Motor Credit Company, Inc. (Motor Credit), an automobile finance company, allegedly converted certain of Nelson’s personal property when Motor Credit repossessed Nelson’s automobile and Zeagler hauled it away.

Both Zeagler and Motor Credit were served on January 24, 1979, with a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stevens v. Sun NewsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  2. Jolley v. JollySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. Livingston v. South Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  4. Richardson Construction Co. v. Meek Engineering & Construction Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  5. Williams v. CarpenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Payne v. Holiday Towers, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Timothy C. Doughtie Advertising, Inc. v. Nelsen Steel & Wire Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API