Legal Opinion
Kaczynski v. Van Amerongen
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 7, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court of Schenectady County (Griset, J.), entered June 18, 1999, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, for modification of a prior order of custody.
The parties are the biological parents of Carly who was born in 1993 during the course of a six-year relationship which was to be consummated in marriage until respondent learned, 36 hours prior to the wedding, that petitioner had not yet separated, let alone divorced, his wife of now 29 years. At all times, Carly resided with respondent. After…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eschbach v. EschbachNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Friederwitzer v. FriederwitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Farnham v. FarnhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Van Hoesen v. Van HoesenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Carl J. B. v. Dorothy T.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- London v. LondonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Figueroa v. LopezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Vickery v. VickeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Tammy II. v. Jeffrey HH.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002