Legal Opinion
Pearson v. Juras
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided February 2, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.
This is an appeal by a claimant for review of the decision of an administrative agency-—here the Public Welfare Division. Respondent Juras is its administrator. As such, following a hearing before, and findings by, a hearing officer, he concluded that the claimant was not eligible for aid to the disabled because she was under 21 and not emancipated.
ORS 412.520 provides:
“Aid shall be granted to any needy person 18 years of age or older who is disabled and who:
“(1) Is a resident of the State of Oregon.
“(2) Is not an inmate of a public institution (except as a patient in a medical institution)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
- Gouge v. DavidOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- Boggs v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
3Cited by4 opinions
- Joint Council of Teamsters No. 37 v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Smith v. PeetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Cannon v. JurasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
- Kelly v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 070742c (or.tax 5-8-2008)Oregon Tax Court · 2008