Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Juras

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 2, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFort, J.

This is an appeal by a claimant for review of the decision of an administrative agency-—here the Public Welfare Division. Respondent Juras is its administrator. As such, following a hearing before, and findings by, a hearing officer, he concluded that the claimant was not eligible for aid to the disabled because she was under 21 and not emancipated.

ORS 412.520 provides:

“Aid shall be granted to any needy person 18 years of age or older who is disabled and who:
“(1) Is a resident of the State of Oregon.
“(2) Is not an inmate of a public institution (except as a patient in a medical institution)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oregon Newspaper Publishers Ass'n v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Gouge v. DavidOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Boggs v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Joint Council of Teamsters No. 37 v. Oregon Liquor Control CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  2. Smith v. PeetCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
  3. Cannon v. JurasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  4. Kelly v. Department of Revenue, Tc-Md 070742c (or.tax 5-8-2008)Oregon Tax Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API