Legal Opinion

Ray J. Hope and Doris F. Hope v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 29, 1986No. 85-3623PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDITH HOLLAN JONES, Circuit Judge:

This case involves the construction of the retroactivity provision [§ 251(c)(1) and (2) ] of the incentive stock option section of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (“ERTA”), Pub.L. No. 97-34, § 251(c)(1) & (2) 95 Stat. 172, 257-58 (1981) [hereinafter referred to as ERTA]. Additionally, the modification rule contained in I.R.C. § 425(h) and Question and Answer 9 and 10 of Temporary Regulations relating to Incentive Stock Options, 26 C.F.R. § 14a.422A-l (1986) must be construed as they interrelate with the other provisions. The district court approved the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. CorrellSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. Vogel Fertilizer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Rowan Cos. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Helvering v. Oregon Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Falkowski v. Imation Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. BNSF Railway Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API