Legal Opinion

Moore v. Mullen

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1993No. 19827PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Acting Judge.

Margarete D. Moore (MDM) appeals from a district court judgment and decree that reformed a deed held by Respondents Marvin and Kathleen Mullen (Mullens) to include a Vi lot deeded to MDM by her son and daughter-in-law William I. and Patsy Ann Moore (Moores). MDM argues that the district court committed clear error when it decreed that there had been a mutual mistake by the Moores and United First Federal Savings and Loan Association (UFFS 1 ) when a note and deed of trust were executed to secure a home equity loan. For the following reasons we reverse and remand.

FACTS AND…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Dinneen v. FinchIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Pierstorff v. Gray's Auto ShopIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Russ Ballard & Family Achievement Institute v. Lava Hot Springs Resort, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Bailey v. EwingIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Belk v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Twin Forks Ranch, Inc. v. BrooksNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Dennett v. KuenzliIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Beard v. GeorgeIdaho Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API