Legal Opinion

In re Wolfrom

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1997No. 97-1249PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

IT IS ORDERED by the court that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(1), respondent, Carl T. Wolfrom, a.k.a. Carl Thompson Wolfrom, Attorney Registration No. 0019564, be reinstated to the practice of law.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the requirements of this court’s order dated July 11, 1997, requiring respondent to file with the Clerk of this court' and with Disciplinary Counsel an affidavit of compliance on or before August 11, 1997, and to comply with Gov.Bar R. X(3)(G) be waived.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(D)(2), reinstatement of respondent…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re WolfromOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re WolfromOhio Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API