Legal Opinion

In re Wolfrom

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1997No. 97-1249PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1225IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter be, and is hereby, referred to the Disciplinary Counsel for investigation and commencement of disciplinary proceedings.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Carl T. Wolfrom, a.k.a. Carl Thompson Wolfrom, immediately cease and desist from the practice of law in any form and is hereby forbidden to appear on behalf of another before any court, judge, commission, board, administrative agency, or other public authority.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, effective immediately, he be forbidden to counsel or advise, or prepare legal instruments for others or in any manner perform…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. WolfromOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In re WolfromOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Columbus Bar Assn. v. WolfromOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. In re WolfromOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In re WolfromOhio Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API