Legal Opinion

Roos v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 5, 1940No. 43616PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

The question in this case is whether the notice on Treasury Form 870 executed and filed by plaintiff under and pursuant to the provisions of subdivision (d) of section 274 of the Revenue Act of 1926 prior to the date on which the Commissioner of Internal Revenue made a final determination in respect to plaintiff’s tax liability for 1927, and mailed notice of such determination to the taxpayer, operated to stop the running of interest under the provisions of section 274(j) of the Revenue Act of 1926 on the amount of $18,447.91 as a deficiency for 1927 on a date thirty days…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Moore v. Cleveland Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  2. Lehigh Portland Cement Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
  3. Standard Portland Cement Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Associated Mutuals, Inc. v. DelaneyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  3. Blansett v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1960
  4. United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API