Legal Opinion

Gaurdian Alarm Co. v. Mahmoud

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 2006No. L-05-1235PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Handwork, Judge.

{¶ 1} In this accelerated appeal from a judgment of the Toledo Municipal Court, appellant, Ali Mahmoud, d.b.a. Six-12 Mini Mart, asserts a single assignment of error:

{¶ 2} “The trial court erred in denying defendant-appellant’s motion for relief from judgment.”

{¶ 3} On July 23, 2001, appellee, Guardian Alarm Company, filed a complaint in the Toledo Municipal Court seeking the payment of $7,434.74, plus interest, allegedly owed to appellee by appellant. Attached to the complaint was a contract for security services to be provided to “6-12 Market” by appellee. The contract is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Caruso-Ciresi, Inc. v. LohmanOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Volodkevich v. VolodkevichOhio Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mezatasta v. Ent. Hill FarmOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Daimler Chrysler Fin. v. L.N.H., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Deutsche Bank Trust Co. v. Barksdale WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API