Gaurdian Alarm Co. v. Mahmoud
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Handwork, Judge.
{¶ 1} In this accelerated appeal from a judgment of the Toledo Municipal Court, appellant, Ali Mahmoud, d.b.a. Six-12 Mini Mart, asserts a single assignment of error:
{¶ 2} “The trial court erred in denying defendant-appellant’s motion for relief from judgment.”
{¶ 3} On July 23, 2001, appellee, Guardian Alarm Company, filed a complaint in the Toledo Municipal Court seeking the payment of $7,434.74, plus interest, allegedly owed to appellee by appellant. Attached to the complaint was a contract for security services to be provided to “6-12 Market” by appellee. The contract is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Caruso-Ciresi, Inc. v. LohmanOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Volodkevich v. VolodkevichOhio Supreme Court · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mezatasta v. Ent. Hill FarmOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Daimler Chrysler Fin. v. L.N.H., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2012
- Deutsche Bank Trust Co. v. Barksdale WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2007