Legal Opinion

Aguiar v. Stancil

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided June 5, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00235Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ALEXANDRIA DIVISION ANDRES AGUIAR, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:18-CV-235-P Plaintiff VERSUS JUDGE DEE D. DRELL M.A. STANCIL, ET AL., MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEREZ-MONTES Defendants MEMORANDUM ORDER Before the Court is a Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Doc. 26) filed by pro se Plaintiff Andres Aguiar (#37249-053) (“Aguiar”). Aguiar filed a Complaint under Bivens v. Six Unknown Agents of the Federal Bureau of Narcotics,1 which was denied and dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 24). After the Judgment (Doc. 24) was signed, the Clerk received Aguiar’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Templet v. Hydrochem Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
  3. Williamson Pounders Architects, P.C. v. Tunica CountyDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API