Legal Opinion
Harrold v. Flournoy
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 14, 1956No. 8514PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARDY, Judge.
This suit was instituted by plaintiff, as the owner of five mechanical devices known as pinball machines, against the Sheriff of Caddo Parish and the Chief of Police of the City of Shreveport, which officials were alleged to have possession of the machines in question. Plaintiff sought judgment decreeing him to be the owner of the machines and entitled to the possession thereof; alternatively, for the recovery of judgment in solido against the defendants' in the sum of $1,500 as the alleged value of the machines, and further prayed for a permanent injunction against both…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Osborn v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- State ex rel. Walker v. Judge of Section "A," Criminal District CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
- Arthurs v. VilleréSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1891
- Carre v. International Car Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Malone v. SaleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
3Cited by3 opinions
- United Benefit Fire Ins. Co. of Omaha v. Garrison ex rel. Parish of OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
- S. & H. Novelty Co. v. FlournoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956
- Spot Commission Club, Inc. v. FlournoyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956