Legal Opinion
People v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 28, 1969No. Civ. 34491PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FEINERMAN, J. pro tem. *
Pursuant to Penal Code sec tion 1538.5, subdivision (o), petitioner seeks a writ of mandate directed to respondent court requiring it to annul its action of March 12, 1969, suppressing evidence and to make a new and different order denying the motion to suppress evidence.
We have concluded that the respondent court’s action in granting the motion to suppress evidence was in error and that a peremptory writ of mandate should issue.
Statement op Facts
On September 7, 1968, at approximately 3 a.m., Police Officer Lunder observed the real party in interest (hereinafter…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- People v. MickelsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Pendergraft v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- People v. NicklesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. HubbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- People v. ClyneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
- Thomas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.