Hurlock v. Bader
Court of Chancery of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
The Vice-Chancellor:
Respondent has declined to accept a deed of conveyance tendered him by complainants, and has refused to pay the balance of the purchase price of the two lots concerned in the contract of sale between the parties. He justifies his refusal on the asserted ground that complainants are unable to convey the lots to him in fee simple, as called for by the contract. He contends that the deed of Helen J. G. Reilly to complainant Charles S. Hurlock, which is the source of any interest complainants may have in the lots, was ineffectual to vest in Hurlock a fee simple title. Whether…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lane v. LaneSupreme Court of Delaware · 1903
- Rice v. ParkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
- Reeside v. Annex Building Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1933
- Security Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. WardCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1915
- Wilmington Trust Co v. GrierCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Wilson v. ChadbourneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978