Anaheim Water Co. v. Jurupa Land & Water Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion. E. E. Houghton, Houghton & Houghton, Collier & Evans, E. W. Freeman, P. S. Castleman, and Byron Waters, for Appellants. E. E. ICeech, Eichard Melrose, John S. Chapman, and A. W. Hutton, for Plaintiffs, Eespondents.
Read the full summary
The facts are stated in the opinion. E. E. Houghton, Houghton & Houghton, Collier & Evans, E. W. Freeman, P. S. Castleman, and Byron Waters, for Appellants. E. E. ICeech, Eichard Melrose, John S. Chapman, and A. W. Hutton, for Plaintiffs, Eespondents. Graves, O’Melveny & Shankland, W. E. Bell, Purington & Adair, W. A. Purington, E. W. McGraw, Paris & Allison, Charles L. Allison, Goodcell & Leonard, Freeman & Bates, John Brown, C. E. Sumner, Murphy & Gottschalk, F. B. Daly, Curtis, Oster & Curtis, and Ezra Crossman, for Defendants made Eespondents.
1Opinion of the Court
COOPER, C.
This appeal is by certain defendants from an order made by the superior court of the county of Orange, changing the place of trial from said county to the superior court of Los Angeles county. The order was made at the request of plaintiffs upon affidavit showing that the judge of the superior court of Orange county was disqualified by reason of personal interest in the corporation plaintiff. The fact that the judge was disqualified was conceded, but upon the hearing of the motion affidavits were filed, on behalf of certain defendants, tending to show that it would be more…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Krumdick v. CrumpCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. EbeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- City of Oakland v. HartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900