Legal Opinion

Matter of Will of Jarvis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1993No. 310PA92PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Justice.

This case presents the question whether the trial court properly directed a verdict for the propounders of a will on the issues of improper execution, testamentary capacity, and undue influence. We hold that the trial court properly directed verdicts as to the issues of improper execution and undue influence, but that a directed verdict on the question of whether the testator had the mental capacity to make a will was improper.

John R. Jarvis, the testator, suffered a stroke in 1970, which rendered him partially paralyzed. Jarvis was right-handed, and the stroke left that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United Laboratories, Inc. v. KuykendallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Braswell v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. ButlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  5. In Re the Purported Will of AndrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re the Will of JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Abels v. Renfro Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. In Re the Purported Last Will & Testament of SechrestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Hodgson Construction, Inc. v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. In Re the Will of MasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API