Legal Opinion

Groves v. Department of Corrections

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 2011No. Docket No. 302640PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarkey, J.

Plaintiffs appeal by right from an order granting defendants summary disposition and dismissing plaintiffs’ case for lack of standing.1 Plaintiffs challenged a contract bidding process run by the Department of *4Corrections (DOC) and the Department of Technology, Management and Budget (DTMB; collectively, the state). We affirm.

The DTMB issued a request for proposal (RFP) on behalf of the DOC, soliciting proposals for the installation and maintenance of inmate telephone systems (ITS) at the DOC’s facilities. The state would not directly pay the ITS provider but would expend funds administering…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Shavers v. Attorney GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Lansing Schools Education Ass'n v. Lansing Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  4. People v. MungoMichigan Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Manuel v. GillMichigan Supreme Court · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Horsfield Materials, Inc. v. City of DyersvilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. Kirk Wool v. Lisa Menard, Commissioner, Vermont Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  3. Tuscany Grove Association v. PerainoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2015
  4. Virgin Islands Taxi Ass'n v. West Indian Co.Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017
  5. Mcna Ins. Co. v. Dep't of Tech.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2019

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API