Legal Opinion
State v. Valle
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 17, 2004No. AC 23348PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WEST, J.
The defendant, Robert C. Valle, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of four counts of sale of a hallucinogenic substance in violation of General Statutes §§ 2 la-277 (a) and 53a-8, and one count of conspiracy to sell a hallucinogenic substance in violation of General Statutes §§ 21a-277 (a) and 53a-48. On appeal, he claims that the trial court improperly instructed the jury (1) on the use of circumstantial evidence from which it could infer the intent elements of accessory liability, (2) by including the definition of “knowingly” in its…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. OteroConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. LewisConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. MahonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. TateConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. ValleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004