Legal Opinion
People v. Bradford
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided August 25, 1989No. 1—87—1623 through 1—87—1626 consPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice LaPORTA
Defendants, Donald Bradford, Green Smith, Luther Woods and Michael Smith were charged by indictment with possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1985, ch. 56V2, par. 1401.) Prior to trial, Bradford brought a motion to suppress physical evidence against him. The motion was heard concurrently with the trial and was ultimately denied. Following a joint bench trial, Bradford was convicted of possession with intent to deliver 9.98 grams of heroin and was sentenced to a term of 14 years. Green Smith was convicted of possession with intent to deliver 126.19…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- People v. PerruquetIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. La PointeIllinois Supreme Court · 1982
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
- People v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Fernandez v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- People v. ColemanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.