Berman v. Cannon
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHARPNACK, Judge.
Harvey N. Berman appeals the judgment against him in favor of James and Rhonda Cannon. Berman raises three issues, which we consolidate and restate as:
I. Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it refused to allow Berman’s counsel to explain the medical reasons behind Berman’s absence from the trial; and
II. Whether the jury’s damage awards to Rhonda and James Cannon were excessive and unreasonable in light of the evidence.
We affirm.
The relevant facts follow. On September 17, 1995, the Cannons were returning home from a historical reenactment. While traveling…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sears Roebuck and Co. v. ManuilovIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Daub v. DaubIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Prange v. MartinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Annee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Topp v. LeffersIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Buhring v. TavolettiIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Levetta Tunstall v. Dawn ManningIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Wyatt v. WheelerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re Estate of JacksonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Noe Escamilla v. Shiel Sexton Company, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.