Legal Opinion

State v. McPhee

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 16, 1955PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTirrell, J.

On exceptions. The respondent was indicted for violation of Section 88 of the 11th Biennial Revisions of the Inland Fish and Game Laws, which provides as follows:

“If any person leaves the woods_ without taking a deer which he has killed with him, he shall notify a warden in writing within 12 hours as to location of the deer and the circumstances necessitating his leaving the same in the woods.”

The substance of the testimony of the witnesses for the State is that on November 11, 1953 a dead deer was found lying in the woods at Eustis, Maine. The witnesses knew nothing of the circumstances…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WebberSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1926
  2. State v. HoffsesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  3. State v. CarletonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1952
  4. State v. MortonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1946
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. AndersonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. State v. WardwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1962
  3. State v. CurlewSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. State v. FongOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State v. GrantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API