Legal Opinion
Empi, Inc. v. Iomed, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 16, 1996No. Civil 3-95-843PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DAVIS, District Judge.
This matter came before the Honorable Michael J. Davis on October 11, 1995 on plaintiff, Empi, Inc.’s (“plaintiff’) motion for a preliminary injunction. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion is granted.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff and defendant, Iomed, Inc. (“defendant”) are both in the business of manufacturing and selling iontophoresis products. Iontophoresis is a non-invasive method of administering pharmaceuticals through the skin by transferring or migrating drugs via an electrical current. The transfer is achieved by placing two…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- McGregor-Doniger Inc. v. Drizzle Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Lois Sportswear, U.S.A., Inc., and Textiles Y Confecciones Europeas, S.A. v. Levi Strauss & Company, Defendant-Plaintiff-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Exxon Corporation v. Texas Motor Exchange of Houston, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rainforest Café, Inc. v. Amazon, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
- Mars Musical Adventures, Inc. v. Mars, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2001
- Rainbow Play Systems, Inc. v. Groundscape Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2005