Legal Opinion
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Casualty Reciprocal Exchange
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided December 8, 1987No. Civ. No. 87-2129PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, District Judge.
This is a declaratory judgment action brought by an insurer to determine which of two insurers must cover the insured’s potential liability in a state court tort suit. The case has expanded to include counterclaims by the insured and the tort victims against the insurer-plaintiff, and cross-claims by the insured against the insurer-defendant and by the tort victims against the insured. Plaintiff has moved to dismiss the tort victims’ counterclaim and also moved to dismiss its own original claim; the insured has moved to dismiss the tort…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Great Lakes Rubber Corporation v. Herbert Cooper Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- HOME OWNERS'LOAN CORPORATION v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Burton Stern, Bankrupt. Burton Stern, Bankrupt v. Ralph Barnett and Phillip Liss, Objecting-Creditors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Rengo Co. Ltd. And Simon Container MacHinery Limited, in No. 80-2556 v. Molins MacHine Company, Inc., in No. 80-2557Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- New York, C. & St. L. R. Co. v. VardamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kuehne & Nagel (AG & Co.) v. Geosource, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- Kuehne & Nagel (Ag & Co), Cross-Appellee v. Geosource, Inc., Cross-Appellant. Geosource, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. Panalpina Welttransport G.M.B.H., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- St. Paul Fire Insurance Co. v. ClaybornCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988