Legal Opinion
Orekar v. Lager
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 6, 1932No. Docket No. 8404PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, J., pro tem.
This action was brought to annul and cancel a deed of trust. Judgment went for plaintiffs, and the appeal is prosecuted from said judgment.
On June 17, 1927, one Tony Ownes filed a suit against respondents herein and Pacific Coast Apartment Builders Corporation, seeking to set aside a deed from respondents to said corporation, upon the ground that the same was executed for the purpose of defrauding plaintiff, a creditor. Upon the same day the plaintiff in said action duly filed for record a lis pendens, giving notice of the pendency of the action.
On November 18, 1927,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bridger v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Warnock v. HarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Welton v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kendall-Brief Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Agnew v. CroninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Arrow Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Du AlbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Teed v. Ridco Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.