Legal Opinion
In re the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 18, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by trustee from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of Westchester County surcharging it in respect of certain investments as being unauthorized. Decree, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. (Matter of Easton, 178 Mise. 611, affd. 266 App. Div. 713, leave to appeal denied, 291 N. Y. 828.) (a) The Easton case involved a testamentary trustee, as in the case at bar and testamentary provisions similar to those herein as to the character of investments to be made. When the Court of Appeals ruled, it had before it the contrary decision in Matter of Doblin (152 Mise. 406) upon whose…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Marchant v. Mead-Morrison Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- In Re the Accounting of MoranNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- In re the Estate of DoblinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
- In re the Estate of EastonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942
- Matter of Tormey v. LaguardiaNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hirsh v. HirshSupreme Court of Virginia · 1969
- In re the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1945
- In re the Estate of LoomisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
- In Re the Accounting of Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1945