Legal Opinion

Rosa & Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development v. Target Corp.

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided February 9, 2015No. Case No. 2:13-CV-817-WKW [WO]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief Judge.

Before the court is a motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 56) filed by Defendant Target Corporation. Plaintiff Rosa and Raymond Parks Institute for Self Development (the “Parks Institute”) filed a response in opposition to the motion (Doc. # 60), to which Target replied (Doc. # 66). After careful review of the arguments, evidence, and relevant law, the court finds that Target’s motion for summary judgment is due to be granted.

I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

The court exercises subject-matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332.1 *1259Personal…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Spencer Waddell v. Valley Forge Dental AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. Jean-Baptiste v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Browder v. GayleDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1956
  5. Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc. v. HeilmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harper v. Biolife Energy Systems, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Dukes Clothing LLC v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, TheDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
  3. Hickman v. American Specialty Alloys, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020
  4. Johnson v. JacksonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021
  5. Whatley v. The Ohio National Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API