Legal Opinion

Ash v. Purnell

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided June 2, 1890PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from eleventh district court. Action by Mang.us Ash against James E. Purnell and others. On trial in the district court there was judgment dismissing the complaint, and plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiff to recover rent for the months of November and December, 1889, of two rooms in the building No. 61 West Fourteenth street in this city. The entire premises were under lease to the firm of Anderson & Blatt, who sublet a portion to the plaintiff, and of his part the plaintiff sublet the two rooms in question to the defendants. Anderson & Blatt were in arrear for rent, and for this reason, on the 12th of October, 1889, the landlord commenced summary proceedings in the sixth district court against them, and their under-tenants, to recover possession of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brown v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Croft v. KingNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1879
  3. Boehm v. RichNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1885
  4. Gallagher v. ReillyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
  5. Gardner v. KraftNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1877

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cornwell v. . SanfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Christatos v. United Cigar Stores Co. of AmericaAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1932
  3. Eastern Offices, Inc. v. P. F. O'Keefe Advertising Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Riglander v. Nile Tobacco WorksAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
  5. Baldwin v. ThibaudeauNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API