Legal Opinion

Elder v. DOWD, WARDEN, ETC.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1954No. 29,055PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEmmert, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment for the appellee who was defendant to a complaint for writ of habeas corpus. We overruled appellee’s motion here to dismiss the appeal, and the cause has been briefed upon the merits.

*258*257Appellee contended in the motion to dismiss that appellant had nothing to present, since he had not filed any motion for a new trial in the trial court. In habeas corpus proceedings it has been the practice in this state to file motions for new trial when a party suffers an adverse decision. See Scott v. Scott (1949), 227 Ind. 396, 86 N. E. 2d 533; Gluff v. Rouls (1950), 228…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Woodward v. MurdockIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. State v. PageSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. Scott v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. HOUTCHENS v. LaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Von Behren v. Von BehrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Elder v. DOWD, WARDEN, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Elder v. DOWD, WARDEN, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API