Elder v. DOWD, WARDEN, ETC.
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEmmert, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for the appellee who was defendant to a complaint for writ of habeas corpus. We overruled appellee’s motion here to dismiss the appeal, and the cause has been briefed upon the merits.
*258*257Appellee contended in the motion to dismiss that appellant had nothing to present, since he had not filed any motion for a new trial in the trial court. In habeas corpus proceedings it has been the practice in this state to file motions for new trial when a party suffers an adverse decision. See Scott v. Scott (1949), 227 Ind. 396, 86 N. E. 2d 533; Gluff v. Rouls (1950), 228…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
- Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Woodward v. MurdockIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- State v. PageSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
- Scott v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- HOUTCHENS v. LaneIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
- Von Behren v. Von BehrenIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
- Elder v. DOWD, WARDEN, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1954
- Elder v. DOWD, WARDEN, ETC.Indiana Supreme Court · 1954