Legal Opinion

Barry v. Raskov

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 18, 1991No. B036174PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

—Defendants appeal from a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff in his action for fraud, negligent misrepresentation and breach of fiduciary duty. Plaintiff cross-appeals from the nonsuit on his claim for punitive damages under his fraud cause of action. We affirm the judgment except as to prejudgment interest.

Facts and Proceedings Below

Plaintiff, Raymond Barry, is a retired person who, over the course of some 50 years, managed to accumulate $250,000 in a savings account solely from his wages. Mr. Barry had no previous experience with investments, other than his savings…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. KaurishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Van Arsdale v. HollingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Fund of Funds, Ltd. v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Slatkin v. NeilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Bihun v. AT & T Information Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Hoch v. Allied-Signal, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Bostick v. Flex Equip. Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Johnson v. NeilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API