Vulcan Materials Co., Inc. v. Iredell County
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Judge.
Defendants contend that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on the grounds that genuine issues of material fact exist and that plaintiffs are not entitled to judgment as a matter of law. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the order of the trial court.
“Review of summary judgment on appeal is limited to whether the trial court’s conclusions are correct as to the questions of whether there is a genuine issue of material fact and whether the movant is entitled to judgment.” Vernon v. Barrow, 95 N.C. App. 642, 643, 383 S.E.2d 441, 442 (1989). Summary judgment is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hyde Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Dixie Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- Hinson v. HinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Gregory v. Perdue, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Mosley v. National Finance Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Summey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. County of HendersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Tri-County Paving, Incorporated v. Ashe County Ashe County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Cherokee Country Club, Inc. v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- SNPCO, INC. v. City of Jefferson CityTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
- PNE AOA Media, L.L.C. v. Jackson CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Sandy Mush Properties, Inc. v. Rutherford County Ex Rel. Rutherford County Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.