Legal Opinion

Balingasa v. Ashcroft

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 18, 2004No. 03-72909Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Edison Averilla Balingasa, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision, which dismissed his appeal for lack of jurisdiction because Balingasa waived his right to appeal the Immigration Judge’s decision finding him ineligible for cancellation of removal, asylum or voluntary departure, and finding him removable. This court lacks jurisdiction to review the removal order because Balingasa waived his right of appeal thereby failing to exhaust his administrative remedies. See Joo v. INS, 813 F.2d 211, 212 (9th…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Chin Kak Joo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API