Legal Opinion

Chin Kak Joo v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 25, 1987No. 86-7256PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

In May of 1983, the INS issued an Order To Show Cause to C.K. Joo alleging that he had been employed in an unpermitted job and was therefore subject to deportation. Before his deportation hearing on September 15, 1983, Joo departed the United States. The immigration judge conducted the hearing in his absence and issued an order of deportation and a denial of voluntary departure. Joo filed a timely appeal to the BIA, and the BIA decided that it had no jurisdiction over the appeal because of his departure from the country prior to his appeal. Joo now petitions this court for review of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ignacio Osvaldo Hernandez-Almanza v. United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  2. Panagiotis Kladis v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Roberto Andres Mejia-Ruiz v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
  2. McGuire v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, District DirectorDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1992
  3. Ath v. ChertoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  4. Balingasa v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Franco v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API