Foster v. Commissioner of Public Safety
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
Respondent’s driving privileges were revoked pursuant to the implied consent law. He petitioned for judicial review, and the trial court rescinded the revocation, holding that there was an insufficient time frame to connect respondent’s drinking and driving. The Commissioner of Public Safety appeals. We reverse.
FACTS
State Trooper Steven Pott, a certified peace officer and certified Intoxilyzer operator, was on duty the evening of December 23,1984. About 3 a.m., while driving south on Highway 35E near Highway 36, he saw tire tracks going into the ditch on the right side.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Johnson v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Dietrich v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Graham v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Hasbrook v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by5 opinions
- Groe v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Connor v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Dutcher v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Eggersgluss v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Eggersgluss v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986