Legal Opinion
Wilbur v. United States ex rel. C. L. Wold Co.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 4, 1929No. 4834PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a judgment in the Supreme Court of the District in a mandamus proceeding directing the Secretary of the Navy to investigate and act upon appellee’s claim, filed in virtue of section 8 of the Act of March 4, 1925 (43 Stat. 1269, 1273). The facts are not in dispute.
On March 22,1918, the appellee contracted with the Navy Department, to construct a storehouse building a.t Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, for the sum of $37,139. The contract provided for liquidated damages a,t the rate of $25 per day for each day the completion of the building was delayed beyond the time…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- AMERICAN SCHOOL OF MAGNETIC HEALING v. McANNULTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Russell Motor Car Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Silberschein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Dewey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Nordahl v. Department of Real EstateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Potomac Electric Power Co. v. HazenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1937
- United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co. v. LoweDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1947
- General Corrosion Services Corp. v. "K" Way Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Opinion No. 70-119 (1970) Ag, Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1970