Legal Opinion
United States v. Andrew Kapsalis
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 12, 1963No. 13721_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAJOR, Circuit Judge.
Appellant (defendant) was charged in a one-count indictment with receiving and concealing a quantity of imported marijuana, knowing it was imported, in violation of Title 21 U.S.C.A. § 176a. Upon trial by the Court without a jury, defendant was found guilty and judgment was entered accordingly. From this judgment he appeals.
Defendant contends that the Court erred in its refusal to grant his motions for judgment of acquittal made at the close of the government’s case and again at the conclusion of the trial.
The government relied solely on proof that defendant had in his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Ambrose Badillo Caudillo, Joe Romero v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- United States v. ChiarelliCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- United States v. James White and Gladys DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- United States v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. FordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. Edward Bernard PeeplesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- United States v. AdamsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Laurence Fredrick Anthony v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Andrew Kapsalis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.