Legal Opinion

State v. Gordon

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 28, 1972No. 7217SC452PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendant contends that the trial court erred in refusing to grant his petition for a new trial on the basis of newly discovered evidence. Appeal does not lie from a refusal to grant a new trial for newly discovered evidence. State v. Thomas, 227 N.C. 71, 40 S.E. 2d 412; 3 Strong, N.C. Index 2d, Criminal Law, § 148. We have, however, treated defendant’s appeal as a petition for certiorari, which is allowed. The granting of a new trial based on newly discovered evidence rests within the sound discretion of the trial court, and its ruling thereon is not reviewable in the absence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. State v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  3. State v. . ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  4. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. HammockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API