Legal Opinion

United States v. Sharon Pollard

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 17, 1984No. 83-5264PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The appellant was convicted for illegally acquiring food stamps in violation of 7 U.S.C. § 2024(b) and appeals, arguing that the district court committed reversible error in its instructions to the jury. The district court charged the jury that the word “knowingly” as used in the instructions “means that the act was done voluntarily and intentionally and not because of mistake or by accident.” The district court also instructed the jury that ignorance of the law is no excuse. The defendant requested a charge that she could be convicted only upon a finding that she knew that her acquisition of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Jack L. MarvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
  2. United States v. Bonnie Sue O'Brien and Paul O'BrienCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1982
  3. United States v. Patrick R. FalticoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. Sharon PollardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Alessandro Moncini, Aka: Sandro MonciniCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Dorothy SchankowskiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  5. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API