Legal Opinion
Williams v. Caruso
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 6, 1997No. Civil Action 96-545 MMSPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Lilia Williams (“Williams”) filed a complaint against Anthony Caruso (“Caruso”), Law Access, Inc. (“Law Access”) and Western Staff Services Inc. (“Western”) asserting numerous counts arising from Caruso’s alleged sexual harassment of her. Specifically, she has alleged claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. as well as state law claims of battery, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, intentional interference with contract, intentional interference with prospective business…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DardenSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Nami v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Barbara R. Sheridan v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Jacques AmblardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Vernon v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Medina v. AdeccoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2008
- Takacs v. FioreDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Watson v. Adecco Employment Services, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2003
- Schuster v. DerociliSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.