Legal Opinion

Ray v. Anderson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 31, 1904PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Reid. City court of Atlanta. March 16,1903.

1Opinion of the CourtCandler, J.

1. The defendant in a suit o’n a promissory note can not inquire into the title of the holder, unless it is necessary for his protection, or to let in the defense which he seeks to make. Civil Code, § 3698.(a) Under the Civil Code, § 5432, the assignee or holder of a note given for the purchase-money of land may, in appropriate proceedings, subject the land to his debt. Hence, in a suit brought on promissory notes of the character mentioned and payable to named persons or bearer, it is not a good defense that title to the notes has (since the passage of the act of 1894, codified in the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ray v. PeaseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Harrison v. LovettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  2. Potts-Thompson Liquor Co. v. Capital City Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. Carlton v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  4. Hilton v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Bibb Basket Co. v. Eufaula Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API