Ray v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Georgia
Complaint. Before Judge Reid. City court of Atlanta. March 16,1903.
1Opinion of the CourtCandler, J.
1. The defendant in a suit o’n a promissory note can not inquire into the title of the holder, unless it is necessary for his protection, or to let in the defense which he seeks to make. Civil Code, § 3698.(a) Under the Civil Code, § 5432, the assignee or holder of a note given for the purchase-money of land may, in appropriate proceedings, subject the land to his debt. Hence, in a suit brought on promissory notes of the character mentioned and payable to named persons or bearer, it is not a good defense that title to the notes has (since the passage of the act of 1894, codified in the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Ray v. PeaseSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harrison v. LovettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Potts-Thompson Liquor Co. v. Capital City Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Carlton v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Hilton v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Bibb Basket Co. v. Eufaula Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.