Legal Opinion

State v. Holman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 17, 1986No. 84-985PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

We granted the State of Alabama's petition for certiorari in this case to determine whether the trial judge erred in denying Robert Holman's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. The Court of Criminal Appeals held that he did and reversed,486 So.2d 497. The facts, as set out in its opinion, are as follows:

"Robert Holman was charged with selling drugs in violation of the Alabama Uniform Controlled Substances Act. His attorney, Mr. David Luker, negotiated a plea bargain with Deputy District Attorney Rod Nelson. The sentencing agreement was that upon a plea of guilty, Holman would receive a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. English v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  3. Chapman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  4. Blow v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  5. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HeatonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ex Parte BlackmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  3. Tweedy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  4. Alderman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
  5. Bland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API