Legal Opinion

Murray v. Miller

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1953No. 7828Published

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, Justice.

Intermediate appeal to determine whether the lower • court abused its discretion in allowing the cross-complainants to file an *44amended cross-complaint. We include here only those facts necessary to dispose of this question.

The appellants are H. C. Workman and Thelma Workman, grantees of the property by deed from Lavina S. Roberts, who is the widow of Harry Roberts and mother of the cross-complainants and respondents. Stanolind Oil and Gas Company, lessee of the property under an agreement with the Workmans, also appeals. The action was begun by plaintiffs in 1947 to quiet…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Grover v. CashUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Sargent v. Union Fuel Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Malmstrom v. Second East Apartment Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Keller v. GerberUtah Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API