Legal Opinion

Williams v. Nelson

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1914No. 2679PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. Geo. G. Armstrong, Judge. Action by D. J. "Williams against Joseph Nelson. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover a commission or compensation for services rendered which he alleges resulted in the sale of certain mining property owned by the defendant. The complaint contains what is contended constitutes three “causes of action.” In the so-called first cause of action, it is in substance alleged that on April 23, 1903, the defendant was the owner of certain mining claims located in Salt Lake County, fully describing them; that on or about the 30th day of April, 1903, the defendant employed the plaintiff to sell said mining claims “and agreed to pay the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sussdorff v. . SchmidtNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Hoadley v. Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899
  3. Clark v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Rucker v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Willard v. CarriganArizona Supreme Court · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Foil v. BallingerUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Platz v. International Smelting Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Ayers v. GuessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  4. Ayers v. GuessSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  5. Badertscher v. Independent Ice Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API