Sandige v. Widmann
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal' from circuit court, Davison county. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. Action by a wife to recover damages for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors to her husband. Plaintff had judgment and defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion. No written notice having been given to defendant Widmann, plaintiff cannot recover. §§ 11 and 16, Chap. 72, Laws 1897.
1Opinion of the CourtCorson, P. J.
This was an action by the plaintiff, as a married woman, against Fred Widmann, a saloon keeper, and his bondsmen, to recover damages sustained by her and her children by reason of sales of intoxicating liquor to her husband by said Fred Widmann between the 1st day of July, 1897, and the 15th day of December of the same year. The defendant admitted he was a saloon keeper, but denied, by reason of *102want of information and belief, most of tho other allegations of plaintiffs complaint. Verdict aDd judgment for the plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
This action is brought under Chap. 72, Laws 1897,…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Griffin v. SebekSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Wegleitner v. SattlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Garrigan v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904
- Garrigan v. ThompsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. BradleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.