Legal Opinion

Broderick & Bascom Rope Co. v. Manoff

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 12, 1930No. 5197PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

The appellant rope company makes a special rope adapted for towing disabled motorcars. It might have called its product a tow rope for automobiles, or an automobile tow line. Developing this latter name through the stage Auto-Tow-Line it devised a fairly arbitrary though suggestive name — Autowline. This was registered as a trademark; and, in so far as the word had a descriptive character, the rope company eventually also claimed rights upon a secondary meaning that the article so marked was its product. The Metal Fibre Rope Company infringed this trade-mark, using…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coca Cola Co. v. Gay-Ola Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Ambrit, Inc. v. Kraft, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Chevron Chemical Company, a Delaware Corporation v. Voluntary Purchasing Groups, Inc., a Texas Corporation, and Hi-Yield Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Badger Meter, Incorporated, Cross-Appellee v. Grinnell Corporation and Mueller CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. The Taubman Company v. Webfeats, a Texas Company and Henry Mishkoff, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  5. G. & C. Merriam Co. v. Webster Dictionary Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API