Legal Opinion

Martin v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 29, 1999No. 81408PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONNNIE L. WHITE, Judge.

This appeal arises from an action seeking a declaration that USF & G, the liability insurer for the City of Boonville, is obligated to compensate appellant, Donald Martin, for the injuries he suffered as a result of the negligent conduct of Melvin Cauthon, his supervisor at the city’s waste water treatment plant. The threshold question is whether Mr. Cauthon, the chief operator of the plant, is an “executive officer” within the meaning of USF & G’s policy. The trial court concluded that he was not. We find that the term “executive officer,” as it is used in this…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Farmland Industries, Inc. v. Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Holm v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Gulf Insurance Co. v. Noble BroadcastSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. Harris v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Seeck v. Geico General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  2. Charlene Harper v. Vigilant Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Todd Ex Rel. Todd v. Missouri United School Insurance CouncilSupreme Court of Missouri · 2007
  4. Burns v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
  5. Ritchie v. Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2009

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API