Daggett v. Al Keshner
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph Gavagan, J.
The plaintiffs sued the defendants on the theory that all the defendants through their separate acts set in motion a series of events some tortious in nature and the others quasi so, to the injury of the plaintiffs. It was alleged that the defendants Berebitsky and Katz, doing business as B & S Garage, through the sale of quantities of gasoline violated a State act, the violation of which created a penalty in civil damages. During the trial before me and a jury these defendants conceded the violation of the statute. In the charge of the court the jury was instructed that because of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Husky Refining Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1941
- Hawkes v. GollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Thornton v. EnerothWashington Supreme Court · 1934
- 279679 Certificate Holders Protective Corp. v. Spier Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1940
3Cited by1 opinion
- Daggett v. KeshnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958