Hunt v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHIELDS, Judge.
On October 31,1983, David Hunt pleaded guilty to driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor.1 He filed a “Petition for Post-Conviction Relief on April 23, 1984, alleging he did not knowingly and intelligently relinquish his constitutional rights. He now appeals the trial court’s refusal to vacate his guilty plea and presents four issues for review. Those issues, restated for clarity, are:
1. Whether the trial court’s findings of fact are sufficiently specific;
2. Whether the post-conviction relief court erred in concluding Hunt knowingly and intelligently waived his…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
- Eldridge v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Hadley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Slone v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. LimeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.